Science vs. social media: Why climate change denial still thrives online

[useapen]

Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

That’s the finding of a review of climate-related conversations on social
media platforms by the public interest research organization Advance
Democracy.

Despite company pledges to crack down, falsehoods, hoaxes and conspiracy
theories circulated with few warning labels or links to credible
information in 2023, contributing to a dramatic surge in the number of
posts denying climate change last year, according to the report shared
exclusively with USA TODAY.

Nowhere was that surge more evident than on X, formerly Twitter, where the
number of posts containing terms linked to climate change denial more than
tripled for the second year in a row, Advance Democracy found.

Advance Democracy saw a significant increase in posts that dismiss climate
change as an exaggeration or a hoax on Facebook.

Of the 10 Facebook posts with the most interactions, eight either denied
climate change or promoted conspiracy theories. None included a link to
Facebook’s Climate Science Information Center or a fact check.

TikTok also failed to rein in falsehoods. Even after the short-form video
platform adopted a policy prohibiting climate misinformation last year,
videos that deny or downplay climate change were viewed millions of times
on the app.

Advance Democracy says that in its review only YouTube has improved. Eight
of nine specific climate change denial phrases identified in Advance
Democracy’s 2022 report are now accompanied by scientific information on
climate change on the platform.

“When it comes to misinformation about climate change, YouTube’s systems
work to raise up content from high-quality sources in search results and
recommendations," YouTube said in a statement to USA TODAY, adding that it
strives to "connect viewers to additional context from third parties like
the United Nations."

The other companies - X, Facebook and TikTok - did not comment directly on
the Advance Democracy report.

The stakes have never been higher, according to Michael Mann, a climate
scientist and professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

Climate change is one of the most contentious debates raging on social
media platforms which have emerged as a critical battleground to control
the narrative about climate change – especially for the TikTok generation,
Mann said.

"Social media is a primary means by which young people - those most likely
to see the worst consequences of climate change - get their information
today," he said. "This trend suggests that bad actors have made a
concerted effort to weaponize social media in a way that is especially
targeted toward young people."

For years, climate scientists have pushed social media companies to
identify and remove posts and videos denying climate change, disputing its
causes, or underplaying its effects.

Social media companies say their policies prohibit climate change
misinformation that undermines scientific consensus - such as denying the
existence of climate change or the factors that contribute to it - while
allowing discussions about climate change policies or personal views about
extreme weather events.

John Cook, a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne in
Australia, says the rising wave of climate misinformation shows that
companies are still not taking the threat of climate misinformation
seriously enough.

“What the platforms are doing is inadequate,” Cook said.

After years of building robust content moderation systems, social media
companies facing political pressure and economic headwinds have pulled
back on gatekeeping, part of an industry trend that some fear could roll
back safeguards that clamp down on misinformation.

X has not changed its official policy on climate change misinformation
under the new ownership of Elon Musk, who took over the platform in
October 2022. But Musk has gutted the platform’s content moderation
operations and slashed staff responsible for monitoring misinformation.

“The rollback of moderation policies and the apparent reduction of content
moderation staff appears to have had a substantial impact on the
prevalence of climate change misinformation on social media platforms,”
Daniel Jones, president of Advance Democracy, told USA TODAY.

Social media posts reviewed by Advance Democracy are routinely peppered
with references to “climate scam” and “climate cult” or claims that global
warming is a hoax or that climate scientists are con artists.

When smoke from Canadian wildfires blanketed much of the U.S. last year,
for example, conspiracy theorists falsely claimed that the fires were
intentionally set to promote a fake climate emergency.

Though the public perception of climate change is shifting, it remains a
politically divisive issue, with Democrats and Republicans growing further
apart in the last decade in how they gauge the threat, according to the
Pew Research Center.

Nearly 8 in 10 Democrats (78%) say climate change is a major threat to the
country, up from about 6 in 10 a decade ago. About 1 in 4 Republicans
describe climate change as a major threat, about the same as 10 years ago.

Few in the GOP deny that burning oil, gas and coal has produced gasses
that are heating the planet but many climate skeptics see the proposed
solutions – weaning off fossil fuels in favor of solar, wind and other
energy sources – as a threat to the economy and Americans’ livelihoods and
freedoms.

“Social media is a primary means by which young people – those most likely
to see the worst consequences of climate change – get their information
today,” Mann said.

Scientists say the warming of the planet is chiefly caused by human
activities that emit heat-trapping greenhouse gasses. The effects include
higher sea levels, drought, wildfires, increased precipitation and wetter
hurricanes.

Climate skeptics use social media to undercut evidence of human
involvement in climate change. Their tactics are often effective,
misleading people and chilling debate, said Cook of the University of
Melbourne.

The unchecked wave of climate misinformation is further eroding public
understanding of climate change and public trust in science and
scientists, researchers warn.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate which recently reviewed videos on
YouTube found that climate change skeptics are switching tactics to
discredit the climate solutions proposed by scientists and the scientists
themselves.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2024/01/19/climate-change-denial-
spreading-social-media/72257689007/

[Kerr-Mudd, John]

On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

[D]

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent
them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take
anyone seriously who uses that term.

There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.

Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.

[Governor Swill]

Post by D
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.

But not human life.

Swill
--
The moon landing was real, Bigfoot does not
roam the northern forests and the 2020 election was not rigged.

GO TRUMP! Go farther! Farther! I CAN STILL HEAR YOU!

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

[D]

Human life is still life. We would be blessed if the planet was covered in
plants. Imagine if the deserts would be turned into productive areas. That
would me amazing.

However... it is not binary.

As soon as electric cars are cheaper and better than ice cars, people will
naturally move.

EU strangely enough turned around and approved nuclear as green energy,
and as soon as we've replaced all coal power on the planet, we'll have
less co2 (that the common man loves to fret about) _and_ a safer, cleaner
and easier to plan, way to generate electricity.

Both people who think climate change is a imminent threat, the ones who
don't care (like me) and the people in between, can surely agree that
green technology who does something better for less is a good thing.

And that is how I believe that this divisise topic can be dealt with
profitably instead of splitting the population in two groups tearing at
each others throats.

Climate strategies based on sacrifice and going backwards in technological
development will never succeed.

Only science and free markets will solve it once and for all.

Post by Governor Swill

Post by D
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.

But not human life.
Swill

[Governor Swill]

Post by D
Human life is still life. We would be blessed if the planet was covered in
plants. Imagine if the deserts would be turned into productive areas. That
would me amazing.

But there weren't any humans then. And it takes more than CO2 to grow plants.

Swill
--
The moon landing was real, Bigfoot does not
roam the northern forests and the 2020 election was not rigged.

GO TRUMP! Go farther! Farther! I CAN STILL HEAR YOU!

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

[Scout]

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I
resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.

I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than
it is today.

I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?

We have no real idea of what governs climate change.

For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.

The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.

Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.

Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken
up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler
periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

[D]

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I
resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than it
is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken up
into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler periods
as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!

And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.

As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

[Yak]

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree
with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained
by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter
than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar
and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to
the atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just
the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to
the axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a
shift in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is
broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that
would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact
global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing
Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve
Goreham. Fantastic book that deals with this climate hysteria we're all
gonna die the sky is falling nonsense.

[Lou Bricano]

On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and

Post by D

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as
they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent
them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than it
is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken up
into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler periods
as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.

https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/

Credentials

M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
MBA from the University of Chicago.

Fantastic book

Piece of shit political polemic.

Fuck off, you priest-fucked nobody.

[Kerr-Mudd, John]

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:34:25 -0800

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and

Post by D

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as
they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent
them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than it
is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken up
into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler periods
as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
Credentials
M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
MBA from the University of Chicago.

Fantastic book

Piece of shit political polemic.
Fuck off, you priest-fucked nobody.

I feel a more reasoned argument might help; these Climate Deniers need
help.

Science is real.

[Lou Bricano]

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:34:25 -0800

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and

Post by D

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as
they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent
them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than it
is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken up
into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler periods
as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
Credentials
M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
MBA from the University of Chicago.

Fantastic book

Piece of shit political polemic.
Fuck off, you priest-fucked nobody.

I feel a more reasoned argument might help; these Climate Deniers need
help.
Science is real.

Reason is wasted on lying hyper-partisan extremists like Gak and Hartung. They
are not amenable to reason. In fact, they are entirely incapable of it.

[Anonymous]

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times — and

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I
resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than
it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift in
the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken
up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core towards
the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat transfer to the
surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler
periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
   Credentials
   M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
   MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and all the climate "scientists"
put together. And he's NOT commenting outside his area of expertise.

You can't fool an engineer.

[Lou Bricano]

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I
resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than
it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken
up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler
periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
    Credentials
    M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
    MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and

No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate, just
like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a
squat-to-piss fairy.

[Anonymous]

Post by Lou Bricano

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than
it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken
up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler
periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
    Credentials
    M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
    MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and

No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate, just
like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a
squat-to-piss fairy.

But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics,
unlike you and all climate "scientists".

[Lou Bricano]

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter
than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar
and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just
the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is
broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that
would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact
global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing
Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
    Credentials
    M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
    MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and

No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate,
just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a
squat-to-piss fairy.

But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics

He doesn't know a thing about climate, you pseudo-tough squat-to-piss fairy.
Fuck off.

[Lou Bricano]

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter
than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar
and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just
the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is
broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that
would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact
global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing
Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
    Credentials
    M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
    MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and

No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate,
just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a
squat-to-piss fairy.

But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics

He doesn't know a thing about climate, you pseudo-tough squat-to-piss fairy.
Fuck off.

[Lou Bricano]

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter
than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar
and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just
the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is
broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that
would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact
global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing
Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
    Credentials
    M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
    MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and

No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate,
just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a
squat-to-piss fairy.

But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics

He doesn't know a thing about climate, you pseudo-tough squat-to-piss fairy.
Fuck off.

[Lou Bricano]

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times —

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter
than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar
and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just
the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is
broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that
would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact
global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing
Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
    Credentials
    M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
    MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and

No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate,
just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a
squat-to-piss fairy.

But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics

He doesn't know a thing about climate, you pseudo-tough squat-to-piss fairy.
Fuck off.

[Yak]

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics
and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does
not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet
was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C
hotter than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by
solar and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another
reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the
surface to the atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in
just the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass
closer to the axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest
a shift in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it
is broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center..
that would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner
core towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate
of heat transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to
impact global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly
even causing Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes
have occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now
have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
    Credentials
    M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
    MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and

No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about
climate, just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not
tough. You're a squat-to-piss fairy.

But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics,
unlike you and all climate "scientists".

The author sources every claim he makes in the book, which is an
excellent read. Meanwhile Jon Ball, resident dwarf, puts his full faith
and credit into leading climate experts like Al Gore, Bill Nye and Klaus
Schwab.

[D]

Post by Anonymous
But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics,
unlike you and all climate "scientists".

The author sources every claim he makes in the book, which is an excellent
read. Meanwhile Jon Ball, resident dwarf, puts his full faith and credit into
leading climate experts like Al Gore, Bill Nye and Klaus Schwab.

I'll have to go with Yak on this one. Overall I'd trust an engineer way
more when it comes to climate science than gender scholars, politicians and other
clowns.

[Lou Bricano]

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano

Post by Anonymous

Post by Lou Bricano
On 1/22/2024 7:55 AM, Gak, fucked up the ass by priests hundreds of times

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree
with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained
by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter
than it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar
and atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to
the atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just
the last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to
the axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a
shift in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is
broken up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that
would speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact
global temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing
Cooler periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.

A fucking incompetent unqualified climate change denier.
https://www.desmog.com/steve-goreham/
    Credentials
    M.S. In Electrical Engineering from the University of Illinois.1
    MBA from the University of Chicago.

Looks to me that he's smarter than you and

No, it is a certainty that he doesn't know one fucking thing about climate,
just like you. Fuck off, pseudo-tough asshole. You're not tough. You're a
squat-to-piss fairy.

But he DOES know a thing about energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics,
unlike you and all climate "scientists".

The author sources every claim he makes in the book, which is an excellent read.

It's shit, because his sources are shit. He is incompetent to identify reliable
and valid sources on climate.

Meanwhile Jon Ball,

No such participant here, as you well know. (I just *love* rubbing your nose in
that.)

[D]

Post by D

Post by Scout

Post by D
I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 is 421ppm.
I would simply not that for most of the Roman empire is was 2C hotter than
it is today.
I suppose all their heavy industry and oil usage was to blame?
We have no real idea of what governs climate change.
For example. most assume that climate change is driven purely by solar and
atmospheric causes.. but what if there were another reason?
A reason that until recently we hadn't even considered?
Specifically, increased heat transfer from the core to the surface to the
atmosphere.
Nonsense you say?
Except we have some interesting data from instruments produced in just the
last few years with the precision necessary.
The Earth's spin is ACCELERATING.
Now to accelerate an object there are basically two ways to do so.
Apply an external force.. or in a spinning object move mass closer to the
axis of rotation.
Now, given no external force we know of, it would seem to suggest a shift
in the distribution of the mass of the earth.
We know the Earth has a molten iron core, and we further know it is broken
up into at least 2 different regions.
The denser cooler outer core and the hotter less dense inner core.
Let's suppose some of the out core sinks closer to the center.. that would
speed up planetary rotation.
But that material is going to displace some of the hotter inner core
towards the surface, which would over time increase the rate of heat
transfer to the surface.
It would take a very small increase in ground temperature to impact global
temperatures over a long period of time. Possibly even causing Cooler
periods as thermal disruptions occur.
After all, it's often been a mystery why certain climate changes have
occurred without solar or volcanic action.. perhaps we now have a clue.
And it's really nothing we can control in the least.

Amen!
And its probably many factors, some known, some unknown who each,
independently of each other influences this.
As you say, there have been many swings, big parts of northern europe
where under 3 km of ice and grapse being grown in southern sweden
without any industry at all, yet, no one talks about this.

Read 'Green Breakdown: The Coming Renewable Energy Failure' by Steve Goreham.
Fantastic book that deals with this climate hysteria we're all gonna die the
sky is falling nonsense.

Thank you, this is saved in my booklist.

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as they
keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them
trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth had
10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants and
life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed to
CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

[Scout]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation Rudy, which means you're lying.

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as
they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent
them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim about
"CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my breath waiting
for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit
and run away from it.

[Governor Swill]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim about
"CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my breath waiting
for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit
and run away from it.

Well, Scout, he's got you there!

Swill
--
The moon landing was real, Bigfoot does not
roam the northern forests and the 2020 election was not rigged.

GO TRUMP! Go farther! Farther! I CAN STILL HEAR YOU!

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

[Scout]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree
with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained
by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim
about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my
breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You
just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.. but then you showed you didn't care about
citations, the facts, or even the truth.
It was just your way of evading the topic.. so I stopped bothering.
If you would use and learn from the cites given, it might be worth it to do
it.
But you've shown proof/cites means nothing to you. So why bother?
Further.. you regularly refuse to post cites to support any of your
assertions

So you want it. you can find it.. or you can start demonstrating how it
should be done when you make claims.

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I
resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim
about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my breath
waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You just blurt
bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Post by Scout
So you want it. you can find it.

So we know your claim is bullshit.

[Scout]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections
with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that
term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't
hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations,
scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter,

Without you supplying citations I can't accept anything you have to say.

Come back when you provide citations for every claim you make.

After all.. you should follow your own rules.. right?

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim
about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my
breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You
just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

You never supply citations, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously
who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't
hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations,
scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations

..that you can't provide.

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree
with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained
by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie claim
about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't hold my
breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations, scooter. You
just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

..that you can't provide.

Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing citations. I
can't cite something that doesn't exist.

[Scout]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics
and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does
not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet
was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I
won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide
citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

..that you can't provide.

Of course not

I knew it all along.

From now on you will be required to do so.

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections
with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that
term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't
hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations,
scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

..that you can't provide.

Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing citations. I
can't cite something that doesn't exist.

I knew it all along.

Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that I "cite"
something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical, scooter. It's your
usual demanding that someone prove a negative.

Suppose *you* cite yourself providing support for something, scooter? Can you do
it? Obviously not...because you never provide support for your lies/claims.

[Scout]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop
misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics
and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who
does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to
imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last
time the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire
planet was covered with plants and life existed happily on
this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm
without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your
lie claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm."
I won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide
citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

..that you can't provide.

Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing
citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.

I knew it all along.

Did you

Yep, because when it comes to you, it’s a given you're wrong.

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously
who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I won't
hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide citations,
scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

..that you can't provide.

Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing
citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.

I knew it all along.

Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that I "cite"
something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical, scooter. It's your
usual demanding that someone prove a negative.

Yep, because

No, scooter, you didn't know anything all along. That's a lie.

It's settled: you never support your claims.

[Scout]

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop
misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots,
hysterics and irrationalists as long as they keep calling
anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them
trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last
time the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire
planet was covered with plants and life existed happily on
this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm
without harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your
lie claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm." I won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never
provide citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away
from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

..that you can't provide.

Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing
citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.

I knew it all along.

Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that
I "cite" something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical,
scooter. It's your usual demanding that someone prove a negative.

Yep, because

No

Rudy loop

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics
and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does
not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet
was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I
won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide
citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

..that you can't provide.

Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing
citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.

I knew it all along.

Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that I
"cite" something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical, scooter.
It's your usual demanding that someone prove a negative.

Yep, because

No, scooter, you didn't know anything all along. That's a lie.
It's settled: you never support your claims.

Rudy

slaps you down again. That's right, scooter.

[But...but...but...FREEDOM!]

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by But...but...but...FREEDOM!

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics
and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does
not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet
was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm

No citation, so it's a lie.

Sorry, I didn't see your citation

You're the one who was required to supply one, scooter, for your lie
claim about "CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm." I
won't hold my breath waiting for it, scooter. You never provide
citations, scooter. You just blurt bullshit and run away from it.

I regularly supplied citations.

No, scooter, you don't. You never do.

Without you supplying citations

You mean citations of you not supplying citations? Ha ha ha ha ha!

..that you can't provide.

Of course not, scooter. Obviously I can't "cite" you not providing
citations. I can't cite something that doesn't exist.

I knew it all along.

Did you, scooter? If so, scooter, then why did you bitchily demand that I
"cite" something that doesn't exist? That's completely illogical, scooter.
It's your usual demanding that someone prove a negative.

Yep, because

No, scooter, you didn't know anything all along. That's a lie.
It's settled: you never support your claims.

Rudy

slaps you down again. That's right, scooter.

[Blue Lives Matter]

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as they
keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them
trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth had
10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants and
life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed to
CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere trapping
heat, scooter? Nothing. We're not talking about how much CO2 we're breathing at
ground level, scooter, you stupid fuck.

[Scout]

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat... but
I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

Post by Blue Lives Matter
Nothing.

Ok, then we don't need to worry about carbon emissions then.

Post by Blue Lives Matter
We're not talking about how much CO2 we're breathing at ground level,
scooter, you stupid fuck.

Rudy admits he has no idea of how green house gases work.. he thinks they
are somehow only an issue at high altitude....

[Blue Lives Matter]

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists and
zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long as
they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I resent
them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with plants
and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently exposed
to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere trapping
heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat... but I
don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Post by Blue Lives Matter
Nothing.

Ok, then we don't need to worry about carbon emissions then.

False, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree
with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained
by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat...
but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural...

And right there you prove that nothing you have to say is relevant as you
don't know what you are talking about.

Oh, and I see no cite from you that CO2 and CH4 aren't naturally occurring.

[Blue Lives Matter]

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as long
as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers". I
resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will not
take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the earth
had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered with
plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere trapping
heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat... but
I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not naturally
occurring, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections
with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that
term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.
Fossil fuels are naturally occurring.
Fire is naturally occurring.
Oil burning is a natural event.
The exhaust from burning oil is natural.

There is nothing mystical, magical, or unnatural about the natural laws.

That is what is so amusing about you Rudy, you see things that don’t exist.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics, irrationalists
and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and irrationalists as
long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree with them "deniers".
I resent them trying to imply connections with the holocaust and will
not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained by
natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat...
but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not naturally
occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.

No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.

Post by Scout
Fossil fuels are naturally occurring.

Burning them isn't, scooter.

Fuck, you keep walking right into it, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously
who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.

No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.

So you're saying humans are not natural?

So what sort of unnatural creatures are you going to assert we are?

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not agree
with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections with
the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be explained
by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was covered
with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping heat...
but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not naturally
occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.

No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.

So you're saying humans are not natural?

Something naturally occurring, scooter, means something that does *not* occur do
to human activity — by definition, scooter. With very rare exceptions, scooter,
fossil fuels do not spontaneously combust, and when they do, it is virtually
always *after* they have been extracted from underground by humans — which means
it is not a natural occurrence, scooter.

What a stupid, stubborn drunken Virginia camper you are, scooter!

[Scout]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics
and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does
not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet
was covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without
harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper
atmosphere trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.

No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.

So you're saying humans are not natural?

Something naturally occurring

Yes they are.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply connections
with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously who uses that
term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time the
earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and consistently
exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.

No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.

So you're saying humans are not natural?

Something naturally occurring, scooter, means something that does *not* occur do
to human activity — by definition, scooter. With very rare exceptions, scooter,
fossil fuels do not spontaneously combust, and when they do, it is virtually
always *after* they have been extracted from underground by humans — which means
it is not a natural occurrence, scooter.
What a stupid, stubborn drunken Virginia camper you are, scooter!

Yes they are.

That's yes, *you* are, scooter.

It's settled: the emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels
is not naturally occurring.

Time for you to concede defeat on this and move along to your next exercise in
futility, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop
misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics
and irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who
does not agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to
imply connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone
seriously who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other
factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last
time the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire
planet was covered with plants and life existed happily on
this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm
without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper
atmosphere trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.

No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.

So you're saying humans are not natural?

Something naturally occurring, scooter, means something that does *not*
occur do to human activity — by definition, scooter. With very rare
exceptions, scooter, fossil fuels do not spontaneously combust, and when
they do, it is virtually always *after* they have been extracted from
underground by humans — which means it is not a natural occurrence,
scooter.
What a stupid, stubborn drunken Virginia camper you are, scooter!

Yes they are.

That's yes

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is
natural.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously
who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.

No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.

So you're saying humans are not natural?

Something naturally occurring, scooter, means something that does *not*
occur do to human activity — by definition, scooter. With very rare
exceptions, scooter, fossil fuels do not spontaneously combust, and when
they do, it is virtually always *after* they have been extracted from
underground by humans — which means it is not a natural occurrence, scooter.
What a stupid, stubborn drunken Virginia camper you are, scooter!

Yes they are.

That's yes, *you* are, scooter.
It's settled: the emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels
is not naturally occurring.
Time for you to concede defeat on this and move along to your next exercise in
futility, scooter.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by Blue Lives Matter

Post by Scout

Post by D

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I do not believe in the doom and gloom climate hysterics,
irrationalists and zealots. Yes, I call them zelots, hysterics and
irrationalists as long as they keep calling anyone who does not
agree with them "deniers". I resent them trying to imply
connections with the holocaust and will not take anyone seriously
who uses that term.
There is no proof and the majority of climate change can be
explained by natural causes such as the sun, dust and other factors.
Of course there are no tipping points as well, and the last time
the earth had 10x the CO2 in the atmosphere the entire planet was
covered with plants and life existed happily on this planet.

Let's put it this way.. at work you can be regularly and
consistently exposed to CO2 concentrations up to 5,000ppm without harm

What the fuck does that have to do with CO2 in the upper atmosphere
trapping heat, scooter?

Far less than the Dihydrogen Monoxide in the atmosphere trapping
heat... but I don't see people calling for water vapor to be banned.

The water vapor is naturally occurring, scooter. The CO2 and CH4 are not.

Wow.. Carbon dioxide and methane are somehow unnatural

The CO2 and CH4 that are produced by burning fossil fuels are not
naturally occurring, scooter.

Sure they are.

No, scooter, they are not. They occur due to human activity.

So you're saying humans are not natural?

Something naturally occurring, scooter, means something that does *not*
occur do to human activity — by definition, scooter. With very rare
exceptions, scooter, fossil fuels do not spontaneously combust, and when
they do, it is virtually always *after* they have been extracted from
underground by humans — which means it is not a natural occurrence, scooter.
What a stupid, stubborn drunken Virginia camper you are, scooter!

Yes they are.

That's yes, *you* are, scooter.
It's settled: the emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels
is not naturally occurring.
Time for you to concede defeat on this and move along to your next exercise in
futility, scooter.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

[Just Wondering]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Scout
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
things humans do are natural. You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.

[Governor Swill]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Scout

Post by Scout
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
things humans do are natural.

Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.

Post by Just Wondering
You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.

You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life.

Swill
--
A Republican making sense:
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2023/10/15/sotu-crenshaw-full.cnn

It's really hard to screw up America.
A lot of people have been trying for well over 250 years
but we're still on top. - Dan Crenshaw (R) Texas

GO TRUMP! Go farther . . . FARTHER . . . I CAN STILL HEAR YOU!

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

[Just Wondering]

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Scout
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
things humans do are natural.

Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what
you think it means." - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride.

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering
You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.

You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life.

Now you're just being silly. Humans are the most adaptable
multi-cellular species that ever existed. Taken as a whole,
a small CO2-driven temperature rise is actually good for the
ecosphere.

[Governor Swill]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Scout

Post by Scout
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
things humans do are natural.

Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what
you think it means." - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride.

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering
You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.

You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life.

Now you're just being silly. Humans are the most adaptable
multi-cellular species that ever existed. Taken as a whole,
a small CO2-driven temperature rise is actually good for the
ecosphere.

Small? Like, how many parts per million?

Swill
--
A Republican making sense:
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2023/10/15/sotu-crenshaw-full.cnn

It's really hard to screw up America.
A lot of people have been trying for well over 250 years
but we're still on top. - Dan Crenshaw (R) Texas

GO TRUMP! Go farther . . . FARTHER . . . I CAN STILL HEAR YOU!

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

[Just Wondering]

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Scout
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
things humans do are natural.

Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what
you think it means." - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride.

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering
You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.

You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life.

Now you're just being silly. Humans are the most adaptable
multi-cellular species that ever existed. Taken as a whole,
a small CO2-driven temperature rise is actually good for the
ecosphere.

Small? Like, how many parts per million?

Temperatures are not measured in parts per million.

[Governor Swill]

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering

Post by Scout

Post by Scout
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

The last I checked, humans are part of nature. Therefore,
things humans do are natural.

Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what
you think it means." - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride.

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Just Wondering
You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature. That is unnatural.

You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life.

Now you're just being silly. Humans are the most adaptable
multi-cellular species that ever existed. Taken as a whole,
a small CO2-driven temperature rise is actually good for the
ecosphere.

Small? Like, how many parts per million?

Temperatures are not measured in parts per million.

My reference was to the CO2 driving the temperature change in response to the ludicrous
claim that it's good for ecosphere.

A better retort might have been to refer to Venus, extremely high in CO2 and temperature
yet barren.

Swill
--
A Republican making sense:
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2023/10/15/sotu-crenshaw-full.cnn

It's really hard to screw up America.
A lot of people have been trying for well over 250 years
but we're still on top. - Dan Crenshaw (R) Texas

GO TRUMP! Go farther . . . FARTHER . . . I CAN STILL HEAR YOU!

Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!

Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine!

Putin tse prezervatyv! Putin is a condom!

Go here to donate to Ukrainian relief.
<https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/uk/pages/registration-forms/help-cities.html>

[Max Boot]

Post by Governor Swill

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Scout
The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning
fossil fuels is not naturally occurring.

The emission of carbon dioxide and methane by burning fossil fuels is

unnatural — it's human-caused, thus unnatural.

The last I checked, humans are part of nature.  Therefore,
things humans do are natural.

Humans originally did not naturally burn anything, Francis. It's a learned behavior.

Post by Governor Swill
Yeah, air conditioning, automobiles and polyester are all *extremely* natural.

"You keep using that word.  I do not think it means what
you think it means."

You keep using "naturally occurring" in a wrong way, Francis. "Naturally
occurring," Francis, *means* "not caused or created by humans." That's what it
means, Francis.

Post by Governor Swill

  You just want to redefine
terms to exclude people from nature.  That is unnatural.

You want to exclude humans from a planet that cannot support human life.

Now you're just being silly.  Humans are the most adaptable
multi-cellular species that ever existed.  Taken as a whole,
a small CO2-driven temperature rise is actually good for the
ecosphere.

The rise in atmospheric CO2 is *already* far beyond "small," Francis, and it is
horrific for the "ecosphere" [sic].

[Anonymous]

Post by Kerr-Mudd, John
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:16:02 -0000 (UTC)

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

But, but, Freedom!

I agree, you should have no right to spread the disinformation that
is climate "science".

[Scout]

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well, the problem is climate change is a constant and depending on where you
chose to measure from we could either be colder or hotter or unchanged.

The causes, is another issue entirely, we have theories of what might change
climate, but we really have no idea.

What caused the Mini Ice Age in the middle ages?

Why was it so much warmer when the Vikings explored Iceland?

Most of the Roman period was warmer than it is today, why?

Now, all that said, reducing pollution and emissions is a worthy goal within
itself, but maybe not with the urgency and short sighted 'solutions' that
could cause more issues than they resolve. I remember when we were told that
paper straws were destroying the planet and if we didn't change to plastic
it would be the end of the world as we know it.

Now we're told paper straws are so much better than using plastic.

See the problem?

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.

"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Post by Scout
the problem is climate change is a constant and

Climate change is not a constant, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because he has nothing else he can attack.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.

These are really shitty writing habits you have that indicate lack of thinking,
scooter. I am right about this wheezy padding being worthless, *and* right that
you do it without thinking...because you don't think.

[Scout]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old..

Meanwhile I will point to the sample provided by Rudy as how he thinks
people should address each other.

But lets remove your padding...

"because it prove you to be ... right"

[Wilson Woods]

On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter. It really does prove you to be a shitty writer, and thus a shitty
thinker.

Post by Scout
Meanwhile

No, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at first worthless padding.

Rudy you really should obey your own standards of conduct.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like a 2 year old.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and
pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant
and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No

You can't even argue?

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and
pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit. That's
right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

You can't even argue?

I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is
argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.

[Scout]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an
opponent immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant
and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit.
That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

You can't even argue?

I can

Stomping your feet and asserting victory isn't a valid argument.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and
pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit.
That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

You can't even argue?

I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is
argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.

Stomping your feet and

No, scooter. I can argue, scooter, and obviously better than you.

[Scout]

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop
misinformation denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an
opponent immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never*
refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something
irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid
fuckwit. That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

You can't even argue?

I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter,
is argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.

Stomping your feet and

No

Rudy's loop

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant
and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit.
That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

You can't even argue?

I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is
argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.

Stomping your feet and

No, scooter. I can argue, scooter, and obviously better than you.
Rudy's

still kicking your ass, as always.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant
and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit.
That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

You can't even argue?

I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is
argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.

Stomping your feet and

No, scooter. I can argue, scooter, and obviously better than you.
Rudy's

still kicking your ass, as always.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant
and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit.
That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

You can't even argue?

I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is
argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.

Stomping your feet and

No, scooter. I can argue, scooter, and obviously better than you.

[Wilson Woods]

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods
On 1/23/2024 5:31 AM, scooter lied:>

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by Scout

Post by Wilson Woods

Post by useapen
Social media is still not doing enough to stop misinformation
denying the
existence and causes of climate change.

Well,

Empty scooter wheeze; nothing but worthless padding.
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent
immediately before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant
and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}

Rudy attacks the language I use because

because it proves you to be a shitty writer and a stupid fuckwit.
That's right.

And Rudy lashes out like a 2 year old.

No, scooter.

Snipped at

No, scooter.

Rudy argues like

No, scooter.

You can't even argue?

I can, scooter, and obviously better than you. What I don't do, scooter, is
argue in the manner you stated in your lie, scooter.

Stomping your feet and

No, scooter. I can argue, scooter, and obviously better than you.