Brooks Moses
2003-07-15 21:41:24 UTC
I state as a fact that a contest with an "entrance fee" is a fraud for
Imagine a plumber is told that there is a plumbing contest. The
plumber is told that if she comes to the contest advertiser's house,
pays the contest advertiser a $25 fee, and then fixes the contest
advertiser's sewage system, the plumber has a slight chance of being
paid for the job as a "prize." Is there anyone who would *NOT* say the
plumber has been defrauded, and that the "plumber's contest" was a
scam?
Well, yes; I would not say that.Imagine a plumber is told that there is a plumbing contest. The
plumber is told that if she comes to the contest advertiser's house,
pays the contest advertiser a $25 fee, and then fixes the contest
advertiser's sewage system, the plumber has a slight chance of being
paid for the job as a "prize." Is there anyone who would *NOT* say the
plumber has been defrauded, and that the "plumber's contest" was a
scam?
"Fraud" is defined as "deception; use of false representations"
according to my dictionary. In the example you gave, the plumber was
told all of the details of the arrangement up front; nothing was falsely
represented, and thus there is no fraud involved. [1]
What there is, however, is a financial arrangement that is likely to be
quite unprofitable for the plumber, and the plumber would be ill-advised
to enter it.
- Brooks
[1] I leave aside the fact that, in your example, the plumber was merely
told of the contest; she did not, insofar as you describe, even enter it
-- clearly that would not count as being defrauded!